Discipline Record

Michael Orrin King, Jr. (P71345) of Grand Rapids was disbarred May 15, 2025, following a default judgment by Kent County Hearing Panel #1. He abandoned at least three clients, failed to cooperate with the Attorney Grievance Commission, and was ordered to pay $10,300 in restitution plus $2,234.48 in disciplinary costs.

Discipline Record — ADB Case Disbarred
Respondent Michael Orrin King, Jr.
Bar Number P71345
Location Grand Rapids, Michigan
Discipline Imposed Disbarment (Permanent)
Effective Date May 15, 2025
Hearing Panel Kent County Hearing Panel #1
Authority MCR 9.115 (Default Judgment)
Client Restitution $10,300.00
Proceeding Costs $2,234.48
Clients Affected At least 3 (separate complaints)
Key Points
DefaultKing failed to appear or participate in disciplinary proceedings, resulting in a default judgment under MCR 9.115. All uncontested evidence was treated as established fact.
Client AbandonmentThe panel found violations of MRPC 1.1(c), 1.3, 1.4, and 1.16(d): neglect of legal matters, failure to act or communicate, and improper termination of representation without protecting client interests.
DishonestyKing was found to have violated MRPC 8.4(b) for conduct involving deceit and misrepresentation reflecting adversely on his fitness to practice law.
Non-CooperationHe violated MRPC 8.1(a)(2) and MCR 9.113(A) and (B)(2) by failing to respond to lawful investigative demands from the Attorney Grievance Commission.
FinancialTotal financial consequence: $10,300 in client restitution plus $2,234.48 in disciplinary costs, in addition to permanent loss of license.

Background

On May 15, 2025, attorney Michael Orrin King, Jr. (P71345) of Grand Rapids was officially disbarred from the practice of law following a series of serious ethical and professional violations. The disbarment is effective immediately. King was also ordered to pay $10,300 in restitution to former clients.

The disciplinary proceedings were conducted by Kent County Hearing Panel #1 under MCR 9.115. They resulted in a default judgment after King failed to appear or meaningfully participate in the process, including neglecting to respond to the Grievance Administrator’s investigative requests involving complaints from three former clients in separate legal matters.

Violations Found

Based on uncontested evidence, the panel found that King committed extensive misconduct across multiple counts. The violations included neglect of legal matters under MRPC 1.1(c) across at least three client cases; failure to act diligently or maintain communication under MRPC 1.3 and 1.4; improper termination of representation under MRPC 1.16(d) by abandoning clients without protecting their legal interests; dishonesty and misrepresentation under MRPC 8.4(b); and failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities under MRPC 8.1(a)(2) and MCR 9.113(A) and (B)(2).

The panel also cited violations of MRPC 8.4(a) and (c) and MCR 9.104(1)-(4) and (7), covering a broad spectrum of misconduct determined to be prejudicial to justice and damaging to the profession.

Sanction

The panel ordered disbarment, the most serious form of attorney discipline available under Michigan’s disciplinary system. In addition to the permanent loss of his license, King was ordered to pay $10,300 in restitution to affected clients and $2,234.48 in costs related to the disciplinary proceedings.

QuickFAQs
What did Michael O. King Jr. do to get disbarred?
King was disbarred for abandoning three clients, failing to communicate or act diligently on their matters, engaging in dishonesty and misrepresentation, and refusing to cooperate with Attorney Grievance Commission investigations. A default judgment was entered after King failed to appear or participate in the disciplinary process.
How much restitution was King ordered to pay?
King was ordered to pay $10,300 in restitution to his former clients and $2,234.48 in disciplinary proceeding costs.
How many clients were harmed?
At least three former clients filed separate complaints that were consolidated in the disciplinary proceedings before Kent County Hearing Panel #1.
What is a default judgment in Michigan attorney discipline cases?
A default judgment means the respondent attorney failed to appear, respond, or meaningfully participate in the hearing process. Under MCR 9.115, the uncontested evidence presented by the Grievance Administrator is treated as established fact, and the panel proceeds to findings and discipline without the attorney’s defense.

Sources and Documentation

Document Michigan Attorney Discipline Board — Kent County Hearing Panel #1, Order of Disbarment, In re Michael Orrin King, Jr. (P71345), May 15, 2025
Law Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct — MRPC 1.1(c), 1.3, 1.4, 1.16(d), 8.1(a)(2), 8.4(a)(b)(c)
Law Michigan Court Rules — MCR 9.104(1)-(4)(7), MCR 9.113(A)(B)(2), MCR 9.115
How to Cite This Article
Bluebook (Legal)

Rita Williams, Grand Rapids Attorney Michael O. King, Jr. Disbarred for Severe Misconduct; Ordered to Pay Over $10K in Restitution, Clutch Justice (July 31, 2025), https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/31/grand-rapids-attorney-michael-o-king-jr-disbarred-for-severe-misconduct-ordered-to-pay-over-10k-in-restitution/.

APA 7

Williams, R. (2025, July 31). Grand Rapids attorney Michael O. King, Jr. disbarred for severe misconduct; ordered to pay over $10K in restitution. Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/31/grand-rapids-attorney-michael-o-king-jr-disbarred-for-severe-misconduct-ordered-to-pay-over-10k-in-restitution/

MLA 9

Williams, Rita. “Grand Rapids Attorney Michael O. King, Jr. Disbarred for Severe Misconduct; Ordered to Pay Over $10K in Restitution.” Clutch Justice, 31 July 2025, clutchjustice.com/2025/07/31/grand-rapids-attorney-michael-o-king-jr-disbarred-for-severe-misconduct-ordered-to-pay-over-10k-in-restitution/.

Chicago

Williams, Rita. “Grand Rapids Attorney Michael O. King, Jr. Disbarred for Severe Misconduct; Ordered to Pay Over $10K in Restitution.” Clutch Justice, July 31, 2025. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/31/grand-rapids-attorney-michael-o-king-jr-disbarred-for-severe-misconduct-ordered-to-pay-over-10k-in-restitution/.