Alexis Krot
Judge's Name
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Impropriety, Impartiality & Diligence
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

In 2022, Judge Alexis G. Krot screamed at a cancer patient over not being able to keep up his yard. The Judicial Tenure Commission did nothing about it, but anonymously featured her in the 2023 Annual Report.

Article Link
Judge Andrea Bradley-Baskin
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Integrity & Independence, Impropriety, Extrajudicial Activities, Monetary Issues
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

Federal agents are investigating Detroit’s 36th District Judge Andrea Bradley?Baskin and her father, attorney Avery Bradley, over allegations of bribery, wire fraud, and financial misconduct linked to court?appointed guardianships of vulnerable adults.

In recent months, the FBI has seized more than $580,000 from properties and accounts connected to their guardianship firms, with clients reportedly barred from accessing needed care after their assets were frozen.

Although no formal charges have been filed and the investigation remains sealed, officials are reviewing records dating back to 2016, and community members have criticized the secrecy and potential breach of trust in the justice system.
.

Article Link
Judge Cylenthia LaToye Miller
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Other
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

Took a loaded handgun in carry-on bag into an airport. No one would have been let off the way the judge was, even with a "squeaky clean" record.

Report appears in anonymized 2024 Judicial Tenure Commission Report:

"A judge self-reported the discovery by TSA of a loaded, unregistered handgun in
their bag at an airport. The judge immediately acknowledged to TSA personnel that they
had the handgun and admitted their mistake in carrying a loaded handgun into the
airport.
The judge was licensed to carry a gun. The judge received the gun from a friend.
The judge initially told police that the handgun was registered but retracted that after
learning that the handgun was not registered because the state the friend lived in did
not require registration.
The judge explained to the Commission that they routinely carry a handgun out
of fear for their personal safety. The night before they went to the airport on this occasion
was hectic and stressful for personal reasons, causing the judge to forget to remove the
handgun from their bag before going to the airport.
The judge pled no contest to the misdemeanor of carrying a gun into an airport
and paid a civil penalty as well.
The Commission found that the judge violated Canon 2(B) by failing to observe
the law. In addition, their conduct eroded public confidence in the judiciary because their
arrest was widely reported. Finally, they violated MCR 9.l04(5) by their plea to violation
of a criminal ordinance.
The Commission took into account the judge’s clean discipline record and
Commission precedent in similar situations. On those bases, the Commission dismissed
with an admonition to take all necessary precautions before future travel to the airport
to ensure they have no handgun with them, and to ensure the veracity of any future
statements to the police."

Article Link
Judge Slaven
Judge's Name
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Impropriety, Extrajudicial Activities
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

A recent Judicial Tenure Commission complaint accuses Slaven of misdeeds, including:

Calling the chief judge “Shackel-fool” from the bench and seemingly mocking her after she told him to make his face visible during Zoom hearings, where it had been obscured.

He subsequently obscured his face with flowers and a Bible during a session, called her a “control freak” and referred to “clueless” people, the complaint said. Slaven told the commission he simply repeated what an attorney said when he made the first comment and was not referring to the chief judge with the latter comments. The commission qualified those defenses as making false statements.

Promoting the candidacy of Tinney by randomly discussing him and displaying slideshows with his picture while on the bench. He’s also said to have printed 160 copies of Tinney campaign materials and voter precinct maps using court resources.
Recording conversations with Shackelford in 2021 and 2022 and lying about it when she directly asked him if he was recording during one.

Directly disobeying orders from her to not copy court staff on emails with concerns on court policies, then copying them on an email saying her misunderstanding of court rules might be due to a lack of reading comprehension.

Repeatedly failing to follow court rules to wear his black robe, even when prompted by multiple chief judges and a state court administrator. Sometimes he placed it in his lap.
Calling court staff incompetent and threatening contempt.

Driving with expired registration and an illegible license plate.

Article Link
Judge Paul John Cusick
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Impropriety
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

Formal Complaint No 104 was closed by the JTC in 2024, where Cusick allegedly withheld evidence on a case he was on while acting as an assistant attorney general.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/wayne-county/2024/08/29/michigan-supreme-court-dismisses-misconduct-claim-on-wayne-co-judge/74994892007/

https://cms4files.revize.com/mjtc/docs/Commission%20Concurrence.pdf

Article Link
Kenneth King
Judge's Name
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Impropriety
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

September 2024 - Yelled at a teenager who fell asleep during a field trip and threw her into jail. Before that, engaged in inappropriate commentary with his Youtube Livestream and violated the civil rights of defendants in his court room. Read more here.

Article Link
Judge's Name
County
Violated Code of Conduct
Impropriety
In Your Own Words, What Happened?

Previously admonished in People v Pennington and People v Smith, in People v. DeLeon, the Michigan Court of Appeals vacated sentences imposed by Judge Qiana Lillard and ordered resentencing before a different judge. Lillard imposed 65-to-80-year terms despite a minimum sentencing-guidelines range of 135 to 225 months, while incorrectly stating that the top of the range was 35 years. The appellate court also characterized her immigration-related remarks as “troubling,” while the prosecution conceded they were “inflammatory,” “unnecessary,” and “inappropriate.” Although the panel did not find that ethnicity or DeLeon’s choice to stand trial drove the sentence, it reassigned the case to preserve the appearance of judicial impartiality.

Article Link