Direct Answer

Public records show that Eaton County Drain Commissioner Richard Wagner — father of Casey Wagner — accepted campaign contributions from attorneys and engineers employed at firms that receive substantial county drain contracts. A drain attorney at Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC donated $500 to Wagner’s campaign while her firm received $8,868.50 in county payments. A Spicer Group employee donated $2,100 while the firm received $194,592.97 from the county. Richard Wagner has previously acknowledged the contributions and provided justifications. The ethical question is bigger than the legal box-checking.

Key Points
The Documented Pattern

Records show that individuals employed at law and engineering firms holding Eaton County drain contracts donated to Richard Wagner’s campaign. The same disbursement records that show firm payments appear alongside campaign finance records showing personal donations from firm employees. This is a closed loop that most county residents have no awareness of.

The Law Firm Connection

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, a law firm that regularly contracts with Eaton County for drain-related legal services, received a $8,868.50 county payment reflected in the February 2024 disbursement records. A drain attorney at that same firm, Stacy L. Hissong, donated $500 to Wagner’s campaign.

The Engineering Firm Connection

Spicer Group Inc., an engineering firm, received $194,592.97 from Eaton County per the same disbursement records. A Spicer Group employee donated $2,100 to Wagner’s campaign. That is a significant personal contribution from someone whose employer depends on continued county contracts.

The Broader Donor Profile

Richard Wagner’s campaign finance records also show contributions from Packaging Corporation of America, which is responsible for an active EPA Superfund water contamination site in Manistee County that remains under ongoing cleanup. The presence of a company with active federal environmental liability in the campaign finance records of an official who oversees county water drainage infrastructure is a documented fact worth scrutiny.

QuickFAQs
Who is Richard Wagner?
The elected Eaton County Drain Commissioner and father of Casey Wagner, the Michigan DOC employee at the center of the Ionia County investigation. Richard Wagner controls drain contract awards, legal services contracts, and engineering procurement for county drainage infrastructure.
Is what Richard Wagner did illegal?
Michigan law permits campaign donations from businesses and individuals who do business with government. The legal permissibility of these donations does not resolve the ethical question. When a drain commissioner accepts money from professionals at firms that receive drain contracts, it creates at minimum an appearance of impropriety — regardless of whether it crosses a legal line.
Has Richard Wagner acknowledged the contributions?
Yes. According to prior reporting in the Lansing State Journal, Wagner has admitted to these types of contributions and offered justifications for accepting them. This is documented as a prior pattern, not a first occurrence.
What is the Packaging Corporation of America connection?
Packaging Corporation of America, which appears in Wagner’s campaign finance records as a contributor, is responsible for a major EPA Superfund water contamination site in Manistee County, Michigan, that remains under active cleanup today. A company with active federal environmental liability contributing to the campaign of a local water drainage official warrants transparency, regardless of the legal permissibility of the donation.

In local government, trust is the bedrock. But what happens when the people who do business with your county — and stand to profit from your tax dollars — are writing campaign checks to the very officials who hire them?

That’s the situation documented in Eaton County, Michigan.

Records show that Richard Wagner, the Eaton County Drain Commissioner — and father of Casey Wagner — accepted campaign contributions from Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, a law firm that regularly contracts with the county for drain-related work.

The Paper Trail

The record starts in 2022, where an attorney from Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes attends the Appeals Board to discuss a Hemp Farm matter on behalf of a county client. It continues into the county’s February 2024 disbursement report, which shows Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC receiving a payment of $8,868.50 for legal services.

Campaign finance records reveal that Stacy L. Hissong, a drain attorney at that same firm, donated $500 to Wagner’s campaign for drain commissioner. A June 2025 major transaction in Eaton County continues that pattern.

Documented Campaign Finance Record Richard Wagner — Eaton County Drain Commissioner
Fahey Schultz Burzych RhodesFirm payment from county: $8,868.50 (Feb. 2024 disbursements). Drain attorney Stacy L. Hissong donated $500 to Wagner’s campaign.
Spicer Group Inc.Firm payment from county: $194,592.97 (same disbursement period). Spicer Group employee donated $2,100 to Wagner’s campaign.
Packaging Corp. of AmericaDocumented contributor to Wagner’s campaign. Responsible for active EPA Superfund water contamination site in Manistee County under ongoing cleanup.
Wagner’s ResponsePer prior Lansing State Journal reporting, Wagner has admitted to this contribution pattern and offered justifications for accepting them. This is documented as an established prior pattern.

Richard Wagner admits to these contributions and excuses them away. This is not his first foray into problematic campaign finance records.

The Structural Problem

On paper, this may be legal. Michigan law allows campaign donations from businesses and individuals who do business with government. But the ethical concerns are larger than the legal box-checking.

When a drain commissioner accepts money from an attorney whose firm gets drain contracts, it creates at minimum an appearance of impropriety. It raises fair questions about whether contract awards are truly independent of who funds campaigns. And it can undermine public trust in the fairness and transparency of local government procurement in ways that no legal disclaimer resolves.

The Pattern

Those who rely on drain contracts help keep the drain commissioner in office. The drain commissioner keeps approving drain work. Taxpayers pick up the tab — often without realizing who’s cutting checks to whom behind the scenes. The loop is self-reinforcing and the public rarely has the documentation to see it.

The fact that Richard Wagner is the father of Casey Wagner — whose conduct in Ionia County is the subject of an extended Clutch Justice investigation — is relevant context for understanding how family networks and institutional leverage function in small-county Michigan governance.

What Accountability Requires

Action Required
Demand Public Disclosure

Ask your drain commissioner and county officials to publicly disclose any campaign contributions from contractors or their employees. The information is technically available in campaign finance records, but most residents have no mechanism to connect it to county disbursement data. That connection should not require investigative journalism.

Action Required
Push for Stronger Local Rules

Stronger local ethics rules can ban or limit campaign contributions from companies or individuals who do business with the county. Several Michigan counties and municipalities have adopted such rules. The fact that Michigan law permits these contributions does not prevent local governments from adopting higher standards.

Action Required
Vote Informed

Look at who funds your local officials — and who profits once they’re in office. Campaign finance records are public documents. Drain commissioner races, county commissioner races, and township board races typically have little public scrutiny. They are also the races where this kind of closed-loop funding pattern is most likely to operate undisturbed.

Drain dollars shouldn’t drown out public trust. Got tips or documents? Share them with Clutch. The public deserves to know.

Cite This Article
Bluebook (Legal) Rita Williams, Drain Dollars and Conflict Questions: Did Eaton County’s Drain Commissioner Cross an Ethical Line?, Clutch Justice (July 15, 2025), https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/15/drain-dollars-conflict-questions-did-eaton-countys-drain-commissioner-cross-an-ethical-line/.
APA 7 Williams, R. (2025, July 15). Drain dollars and conflict questions: Did Eaton County’s drain commissioner cross an ethical line? Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/15/drain-dollars-conflict-questions-did-eaton-countys-drain-commissioner-cross-an-ethical-line/
MLA 9 Williams, Rita. “Drain Dollars and Conflict Questions: Did Eaton County’s Drain Commissioner Cross an Ethical Line?” Clutch Justice, 15 July 2025, clutchjustice.com/2025/07/15/drain-dollars-conflict-questions-did-eaton-countys-drain-commissioner-cross-an-ethical-line/.
Chicago Williams, Rita. “Drain Dollars and Conflict Questions: Did Eaton County’s Drain Commissioner Cross an Ethical Line?” Clutch Justice, July 15, 2025. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/15/drain-dollars-conflict-questions-did-eaton-countys-drain-commissioner-cross-an-ethical-line/.
Work With Rita Williams · Clutch Justice
“I map how institutions hide from accountability. That map is what I sell.”
01 Government Accountability & Institutional Forensics 02 Procedural Abuse Pattern Recognition