The State Court Administrative Office says Eastpointe’s 38th District Court needs 1.87 judges and has one, a workload of 187 percent. Judge Kathleen Galen’s re-election campaign and many of her 47 endorsers present that number as proof of her work ethic, alongside clearance rates of 100 to 106 percent. The rest of the record shows how a one-judge court carries that load. The Legislature offered a fix in 2018 by letting the 38th merge into a four-judge bench, and it never happened. The court has leaned on a part-time magistrate who is Galen’s campaign treasurer and on one visiting judge who collected 70 percent of its visiting-judge money and now endorses her. And the court brings the city more money than it costs.
Every campaign needs a number. Galen’s is 187.
It shows up on her campaign graphics and in endorsement after endorsement: one of the busiest single-judge courts in Michigan, a judge carrying nearly two judges’ worth of work. It is a real number, from a real state report. What the campaign leaves out is everything that number is attached to.
Key Points
SCAO’s 2025 Judicial Resources Recommendations put the 38th District’s need at 1.87 judges against one on the bench. Caseload rose from 14,517 in 2023 to 17,240 in 2024, an increase of almost 19 percent.
A 2018 amendment to state law let Eastpointe, Roseville and Fraser merge the 38th into a four-judge 39th District, with the 38th’s judge keeping her seat. It required resolutions from all three city councils. The consolidation did not occur.
The court’s part-time magistrate is Mark Makoski, Galen’s campaign treasurer. Its most-used visiting judge, William Crouchman, was paid $76,132.07 for 192 sittings, and 88 of his sittings fell on days Galen reported no leave.
The campaign cites 2025 clearance rates of 100 to 106 percent. Clearance measures how fast cases close, not whether they close correctly; appellate courts have vacated several of Galen’s rulings.
Eastpointe’s 2022-23 budget put district court revenue at $1,915,724 against $1,501,083 in court costs, a margin of about $415,000 for the city.
What 187 Percent Means
Every year, the State Court Administrative Office estimates how many judges each Michigan trial court needs. It weights each type of case by the judge time it typically takes, adds up a court’s filings, and compares the total to the judges the court actually has. In its 2025 Judicial Resources Recommendations, SCAO put the 38th District Court’s need at 1.87 judges. The court has one. That gap is where 187 percent comes from.
The filings behind it are climbing. The report shows 14,517 cases in 2023 and 17,240 in 2024, a jump of 2,723 cases, or almost 19 percent, in a single year, in a city of about 34,000 people. SCAO’s recommendation was straightforward: add a judgeship, or consolidate the 38th with its neighbor, the 39th District Court in Roseville and Fraser.
How the Campaign Uses It
Galen’s campaign treats the workload as a credential. One of its graphics cites SCAO’s 2025 trial court performance measures for the 38th District, listing clearance rates of 103 percent for felonies, 101 percent for misdemeanors, 106 percent for civil infractions, 103 percent for general civil cases and 100 percent for summary proceedings, under the heading that the record speaks for itself. The same graphic invokes the 1.87-judge figure and describes the court as Michigan’s busiest single-judge district court.
The endorsers pick up the theme. Macomb Circuit Judge Teri Lynn Dennings writes that she has never heard Galen complain despite the workload. Macomb Circuit Judge Tracey Yokich and Oakland’s Judge Laura Polizzi each cite the court’s standing as one of the state’s busiest. Macomb Chief Judge James Biernat Jr. calls the docket substantial and says he is glad to assist. Chief Judge Mark Fratarcangeli of the 40th District describes the work as Herculean.
A clearance rate is cases disposed divided by cases filed. Above 100 percent means a court closed more cases than came in that year and its backlog shrank. On its face, that is a good number, and the campaign is entitled to cite it. It measures speed. It says nothing about whether the cases were decided correctly, whether the record was kept, or who did the deciding.
Clutch Justice has documented appellate courts vacating Galen’s rulings, including a 93-day jail sentence for a pregnant woman that the Court of Appeals found rested on an unsupported ability-to-pay finding, a sentence vacated on remand in Macomb Circuit Court, and a $505 assessment vacated as error. Attorneys who practice before her describe substantive hearings logged as status conferences, with no transcript available afterward. A case closed quickly and wrongly counts the same in a clearance rate as a case closed quickly and right. The full record is in Causing Her Problems and Off the Record.
Who Carries the Load
No single judge clears 17,000 cases a year alone. A one-judge court does it with help, and in the 38th District the help comes from people tied closely to Galen.
The Magistrate
Michigan law lets district court magistrates handle a large share of a busy court’s volume: informal hearings on civil infractions, admissions and pleas on many traffic matters, arraignments, bond and warrants. In the 38th District, the part-time magistrate since 2022 is Mark Makoski. He is the named treasurer of Galen’s campaign committee, he represented her personally in the Cork Wine Pub dispute in 2021, and he shares a Hoover Road law office address with her going back to at least 2018. Clutch Justice has separately documented his sworn 2022 statement that he stopped living in his Warren house and the water records that contradict it. The court’s 106 percent clearance rate on civil infractions is the category where a magistrate’s hand is heaviest. How many of those dispositions were Makoski’s is not broken out in the public figures.
The Visiting Judge
Visiting judges fill the rest. From June 2021 to May 2026, the 38th District paid $108,860.91 to visiting judges, and $76,132.07 of it, about 70 percent, went to one man: retired Judge William Crouchman, across 192 sittings. His wife, Paula Mack-Crouchman, was paid $84,837.50 over the same period for administrative and grant work. Part of the visiting-judge spending ran through SCAO’s Virtual Backlog Response Docket, a federally funded backlog program.
When Clutch Justice lined Crouchman’s sittings up against Galen’s own reported leave, 88 of them fell on days she reported no absence. That is visiting-judge time used to add capacity, not to cover vacations, which is what a court at 187 percent needs. It also means part of the clearance rate the campaign is selling came from a second judge, paid by the court and in part by federal backlog money. That judge is now on Galen’s endorsement wall, writing that he has never met anyone who worked harder.
Clutch is free to read. It isn’t free to produce. Clutch Confidential members help fund the records requests and the hours behind every investigation, and they vote on what I dig into next.
$10/month ?The Fix That Lapsed
The Legislature saw this coming. In January 2018, Public Act 6 amended the statute that defines Michigan’s district courts, MCL 600.8122, to let the 38th and 39th Districts combine. If the city councils of Roseville, Fraser and Eastpointe each passed a resolution approving it and filed it with the state court administrator, the 38th District would be abolished and the 39th would grow to four judges serving all three cities. The sitting 38th District judge would take the new fourth seat and finish her term. The statute set filing deadlines that ran out before 2020.
The consolidation did not occur. SCAO’s 2025 report recommends it again, seven years after the Legislature made it available. Under it, a single judge carrying 187 percent of a full load would have three colleagues down the road to share it with. The 39th District’s chief judge, Alyia Hakim, is among Galen’s endorsers; Galen contributed to both of Hakim’s campaigns, and she and Makoski gave to Hakim on the same day in 2020.
Galen took the bench in January 2021, after the window closed. The council decisions that let it close were made before her term. The choice to keep running a 187 percent court as a one-judge operation, staffed by a campaign treasurer and a favored visiting judge, has been made every year since.
Timeline Explorer: How the 38th Got to 187
Public Act 6 takes immediate effect, amending MCL 600.8122 to allow the 38th District to merge into a four-judge 39th District if Eastpointe, Roseville and Fraser all approve by resolution.
The statute’s filing deadlines pass. The consolidation does not occur, and the 38th stays a one-judge court. Galen wins the seat in November 2020.
Galen takes the bench in January. Retired Judge William Crouchman begins sitting as a visiting judge in June, the start of 192 sittings over five years. Makoski represents Galen personally in the Cork Wine Pub dispute.
Makoski becomes the court’s part-time magistrate in 2022. Paula Mack-Crouchman begins billing the court in May 2023. Filings rise from 14,517 in 2023 to 17,240 in 2024. Eastpointe’s 2022-23 budget projects about $415,000 more in court revenue than court costs.
SCAO’s Judicial Resources Recommendations put the court’s need at 1.87 judges and recommend a new judgeship or consolidation with the 39th. At the March State of the City, Galen says the planned courthouse includes two courtrooms and she hopes to get a second judge.
Galen’s re-election campaign cites the workload and 100 to 106 percent clearance rates. Its 47 endorsement graphics include Crouchman and Hakim, chief judge of the court SCAO says the 38th should merge with.
Who the Arrangement Serves
A one-judge court has one budget line in one city. Eastpointe is the 38th District’s funding unit, and the court is a revenue center. The city’s 2022-23 proposed budget showed court fines and fees rising from $1,133,736 in 2020-21 to a projected $1,870,000 in 2022-23, and total district court revenue of $1,915,724 against $1,501,083 in court expenditures. Eastpointe’s mayor, Michael Klinefelt, is on Galen’s endorsement wall too, calling her the city’s hometown judge.
Consolidation would change that. Under the 2018 statute, the cities would have voluntarily accepted the expenses of a combined court, and the 38th District’s revenue and costs would have moved into a shared four-judge district. Nobody has to have planned it for the result to be the same: the arrangement that leaves Eastpointe with a court at 187 percent also leaves Eastpointe with a court that pays for itself and then some.
Galen has said publicly that she wants a second judge, and the courthouse design reportedly makes room for one. A second judgeship requires the Legislature. A consolidation the Legislature already authorized required three city councils. One of those routes was available years ago.
Questions That Should Be Answered
The workload numbers raise questions only the court and the city can answer. What share of the 38th District’s dispositions in 2024 and 2025 were handled by the magistrate rather than the judge? How many visiting-judge sittings were paid with federal backlog money, and how many by the city? Has the Eastpointe City Council taken up consolidation, or a resolution supporting a second judgeship, at any point since 2018? Clutch Justice is requesting the court’s disposition reports by judicial officer and the council’s records on consolidation, and will publish what comes back.
I don’t doubt the 38th District is busy. I doubt that busy is the whole story. A court at 187 percent, staffed by the judge’s campaign treasurer and a visiting judge on her endorsement wall, sitting in a city that clears a profit on it, with a consolidation option that has gone unused for seven years, is not just a story about one judge’s work ethic. It is a structure. Eastpointe voters get to decide on November 3 whether they like the way it is built.
Quick FAQs
Where does the 187 percent figure come from?
From the State Court Administrative Office’s 2025 Judicial Resources Recommendations, which estimate each court’s judicial need from weighted caseloads. SCAO put the 38th District Court’s need at 1.87 judges. The court has one.
What did the state recommend?
SCAO recommended adding a judgeship or consolidating the 38th District with the 39th District Court in Roseville and Fraser. The Legislature authorized that consolidation in 2018, conditioned on resolutions from all three city councils. It did not occur.
What are the clearance rates Galen’s campaign cites?
A campaign graphic attributes 2025 clearance rates of 100 to 106 percent across case types to SCAO’s trial court performance measures. A clearance rate compares cases disposed to cases filed. It measures speed, not accuracy, and does not show which judicial officer disposed of the cases.
Who else hears cases in the 38th District Court?
Part-time magistrate Mark Makoski, who is the named treasurer of Galen’s campaign committee, and visiting judges. Retired Judge William Crouchman received $76,132.07 of the court’s $108,860.91 in visiting-judge payments from June 2021 to May 2026, and 88 of his 192 sittings fell on days Galen reported no leave.
Does the court make money for Eastpointe?
The city’s 2022-23 proposed budget showed $1,915,724 in district court revenue against $1,501,083 in court expenditures, about $415,000 more coming in than going out.
Sources
PrimaryMichigan State Court Administrative Office, 2025 Judicial Resources Recommendations, 38th District Court workload and recommendation.
LegalMCL 600.8122, as amended by 2018 PA 6, effective January 26, 2018.
LegalMCL 600.8511, duties of district court magistrates.
PrimaryCity of Eastpointe, Proposed Budget 2022-23.
PrimaryRe-Elect Judge Kathleen G. Galen 38th District Court, Facebook campaign graphics and endorsement posts, captured October 11, 2026.
NewsC&G Newspapers, Eastpointe State of the City, March 14, 2025.
ClutchSeventy Percent: One Visiting Judge Received Most of the 38th District Court’s Visiting-Judge Money; Off the Record; Causing Her Problems; The Wine Bar Clause; One Address, Two Judicial Officers.
Cite This Article
BluebookWilliams, Rita. The 187 Percent Court: What Judge Galen’s Workload Numbers Leave Out, Clutch Justice (Oct. 13, 2026), https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/13/38th-district-court-187-percent-workload/.
APA 7Williams, R. (2026, October 13). The 187 percent court: What Judge Galen’s workload numbers leave out. Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/13/38th-district-court-187-percent-workload/
MLA 9Williams, Rita. “The 187 Percent Court: What Judge Galen’s Workload Numbers Leave Out.” Clutch Justice, 13 Oct. 2026, clutchjustice.com/2026/10/13/38th-district-court-187-percent-workload/.
ChicagoWilliams, Rita. “The 187 Percent Court: What Judge Galen’s Workload Numbers Leave Out.” Clutch Justice, October 13, 2026. https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/13/38th-district-court-187-percent-workload/.
Continue Your Investigation
If this reporting raised more questions, use the Clutch Justice ecosystem to keep going.