For fifty years the Oakland County Child Killer case has been argued as a question of who. The record supports a second question that has never been answered either: who decided what the public, and the families, would be allowed to know.
Content note: this series discusses the abduction and murder of children and the sexual abuse of minors. Details of the crimes are kept to what the record requires.
Mark Stebbins, Jill Robinson, Kristine Mihelich, and Timothy King were abducted and killed in Oakland County between February 1976 and March 1977. No one has been charged. The Michigan State Police leads the case and says it remains open. Over five decades, control of the file has shifted among police agencies, two county prosecutors, and the courts, and the most consequential records about the investigation’s central decisions remain sealed, exempt, or released only after the victims’ families sued.
Christopher Busch was questioned in early 1977 and, in the Michigan Court of Appeals’ words, allegedly cleared after a polygraph. Timothy King was abducted weeks later. In 2013 the same court held the polygraph reports could stay secret.
Timothy King’s father and brother had to sue the Michigan State Police to obtain more than 3,400 pages about the investigation’s most-discussed suspect.
Hair evidence from two of the four cases sat in state police custody for about 35 years before mitochondrial DNA testing in 2012, according to Barry King’s account of the records he obtained.
In 2012 the Wayne and Oakland County prosecutors, who share jurisdiction because Timothy King was found in Livonia, publicly fought over how the case was being disclosed.
At the fiftieth anniversary, Kristine Mihelich’s sister said the family had heard nothing from law enforcement since about 2016 or 2017.
Who were the victims?
Mark Stebbins, 12, of Ferndale; Jill Robinson, 12, of Royal Oak; Kristine Mihelich, 10, of Berkley; and Timothy King, 11, of Birmingham.
Has the case been solved?
No. No one has been charged. The Michigan State Police says the case is open and investigates every new tip.
Was Christopher Busch cleared?
He was allegedly cleared after a 1977 polygraph. The reports remain withheld under Michigan’s Forensic Polygraph Examiners Act. In 2012 Oakland County prosecutors said no evidence tied him to the killings. He died in 1978.
Can families see the files?
In part, after litigation. The King family obtained more than 3,400 pages through a 2010 FOIA lawsuit. Polygraph reports, DNA profiles, sealed records, and investigative subpoena materials were withheld.
I think I finally figured out what has been bothering me about the Oakland County Child Killer case, and it may be a bigger story than any single suspect.
For nearly fifty years, people have argued about who killed these children. Suspects. Theories. Books. Documentaries. Retired detectives. Old leads resurrected and repackaged again. I have written about pieces of this case before, including the North Fox Island operation that runs alongside it. This series asks a different question.
Who has controlled the information?
An unsolved case this old does not exist in a vacuum. Over decades it becomes an information ecosystem. Law enforcement decides what gets investigated and what gets released. Retired investigators keep talking. Journalists develop sources. Authors and filmmakers build narratives. Families fight for answers. Competing theories gain audiences. Some evidence gets amplified, and some disappears from the public conversation entirely. Eventually it becomes hard to separate the investigation from the story built around it.
This is not a story about who I think did it. It is a story about the machinery, and the machinery leaves records. I want the records.
The Four Children, and the Fact Pattern Nobody Disputes
Mark Stebbins, 12, disappeared in Ferndale on February 15, 1976. He was found four days later in a Southfield parking lot. Jill Robinson, 12, disappeared from Royal Oak on December 22, 1976, and was found four days later along I-75 in Troy. Kristine Mihelich, 10, disappeared in Berkley on January 2, 1977. She was found nineteen days later in a snowbank in Franklin Village. Timothy King, 11, disappeared in Birmingham on March 16, 1977, and was found in a ditch in Livonia on March 22.
Those dates and places are the part of the case no one argues about. Nearly everything layered on top of them, including who was cleared, which evidence was tested and when, which leads were dropped, and why, sits in records the public has seen only partially. A task force described as the largest of its kind in the country at the time took in more than 11,000 tips, according to WDIV. It shut down in December 1978. In the decades since, the case has been handed off, contested, and reshaped across institutions.
The First Decision: Who Gets Cleared, and on What
In January 1977, after three children were dead, investigators questioned Christopher Busch, a Bloomfield Township man with a history of sexual offenses against children. The Michigan Court of Appeals, summarizing the record in a 2013 opinion, wrote that Busch was briefly considered a suspect and was allegedly cleared by law enforcement after a polygraph examination. Timothy King was abducted on March 16, 1977, weeks later.
The circumstances around that clearance matter. According to WDIV’s case timeline, Busch was arrested that January alongside Gregory Greene, who was facing child sexual assault charges of his own. Greene told police that Busch killed Mark Stebbins. WDIV reports that both men passed polygraph examinations. Greene was sentenced to life in prison. Busch received probation. Two polygraphs, two incompatible accounts, and one of the two men walked out of the system.
Busch died in November 1978 of what police described as a self-inflicted gunshot wound. A child’s drawing found in his home was later said to resemble Mark Stebbins. For decades afterward, Busch remained the most discussed name in the case. In 2012, an Oakland County assistant prosecutor said publicly that no piece of evidence showed Busch had killed any of the children, and that his DNA did not match.
When Timothy King’s family sued for the Busch file, the Michigan State Police withheld the polygraph reports under the Forensic Polygraph Examiners Act. In King v. Michigan State Police, No. 305474, decided November 12, 2013, the Court of Appeals agreed that the reports could be withheld.
The examination that allegedly cleared the case’s central suspect before the final abduction is, by statute, outside public view. The public cannot evaluate the clearance. Neither can the families.
Another piece of the Busch record sits in Genesee County, where my prior reporting found that Judge Harry Newblatt reduced his bond. That thread belongs to Part II, which maps who had access to whom. The structural point for Part I is narrower. The single most consequential investigative judgment of 1977 was made with a tool Michigan law keeps sealed, and nothing in the system requires that judgment ever be explained to anyone outside it.
Fifty years of custody over one case
Select a stage. Each panel shows the documented event and the information gap it left behind.
Mark Stebbins, Jill Robinson, Kristine Mihelich, and Timothy King disappear over thirteen months. Their bodies are found in Southfield, Troy, Franklin Village, and Livonia. A multi-agency task force forms and receives more than 11,000 tips.
Gap: Timothy King is found in Wayne County. From that point forward, two county prosecutors hold jurisdiction over the same series of crimes.
Gregory Greene tells police Christopher Busch killed Mark Stebbins. WDIV reports both men passed polygraphs. Greene receives a life sentence. Busch receives probation. Timothy King is abducted in March.
Gap: The polygraph reports are exempt from disclosure under Michigan law. The basis for clearing Busch has never been made public.
Busch is found dead in November of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. In December the task force working the case shuts down.
Gap: The public record shows no published accounting of what the task force concluded, what it left open, or who inherited its working files.
Wayne County identifies Busch as a suspect in October 2008, according to Michigan Today. Barry King writes that after an October 27, 2009 task force meeting, Oakland County took charge, the Wayne County investigator was asked to leave, and the Oakland County Prosecutor closed the Busch line on March 1, 2010.
Gap: The family says it was given no explanation for why the lead was dropped. No public document explains it.
Barry King and his son Christopher file FOIA requests with the Michigan State Police for the Busch file and sue in Oakland Circuit Court. By December 2010 they receive more than 3,400 pages.
Gap: Polygraph reports, DNA profiles, LEIN data, a sex-motivated crimes report, investigative subpoena materials, and court-sealed records are withheld under separate statutes.
Mitochondrial DNA links hair on Kristine Mihelich to James Vincent Gunnels or a maternal male relative. Hair from Arch Sloan’s car matches hair from the Stebbins and King scenes, but is not Sloan’s. Kristine’s mother files a $100 million federal suit seeking release of files to the Justice Department. Wayne County’s prosecutor publicly criticizes Oakland County’s disclosures.
Gap: No one is charged. The partial DNA matches point toward people, not proof, and the public learns about them through competing press strategies.
The Court of Appeals affirms that the polygraph reports can be withheld. WDIV reports the Mihelich lawsuit is dismissed in 2013. In 2020, former Detroit News reporter Marney Rich Keenan publishes a book alleging investigative leads were buried. The state police respond that they do not comment on fiction.
Gap: The records that could confirm or refute a decade of reporting stay closed, and the official response is to classify the reporting rather than answer it.
The Michigan State Police remains the lead agency and says the case is open. Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard says his investigators are reviewing genetic genealogy and artificial intelligence. Kristine Mihelich’s sister says the family has had no contact from law enforcement since about 2016 or 2017.
Gap: Two agencies are publicly working the same case. The record does not show whether they share one file.
Who Holds the File
The OCCK case has never belonged to a single institution. The children were taken from four Oakland County communities, each with its own police department. Their bodies were found in four more. The Michigan State Police leads the investigation today. Oakland County’s prosecutor and sheriff have both claimed active roles. Because Timothy King was found in Livonia, the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office has jurisdiction too.
That arrangement produced a public conflict in July 2012. After Oakland County prosecutors held a press conference about DNA evidence tied to Arch Sloan’s car, Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy called the disclosure
“irresponsible”
Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy, on Oakland County’s July 2012 press conference, as reported by WXYZOakland County’s prosecutor’s office responded that the decision had been made jointly by the task force. Then-Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson, a former prosecutor, accused Oakland County Prosecutor Jessica Cooper of political motivation. Barry King asked reporters why the agencies were running in two directions. WXYZ also reported that DNA testing in the case had been going on since 1999, contrary to Wayne County’s claims about untested evidence. The two prosecutors’ offices could not agree in public on what had been tested.
When jurisdiction is shared and no statute names a single custodian, control of a cold case goes to whoever holds the physical file and the press relationship. The public record from 2009 through 2012 shows the Busch lead dropped after a change in which county led, a Wayne County investigator removed from the task force according to the King family’s account, and two elected prosecutors briefing reporters on conflicting terms. None of that required a public explanation, and none was given.
A series like this runs on records requests, court files, and hours no one else is paying for. Clutch Confidential members vote on the next investigation, get early access to installments, join monthly member chats, and receive the Field Kit and course library at no extra cost.
$10/month ?How the Families Became the Archivists
Barry King, Timothy’s father and a University of Michigan Law School graduate, began filing FOIA requests with the Michigan State Police in April 2010. He and his son Christopher sued in Oakland Circuit Court. By December 2010 they had more than 3,400 pages of investigative records. Michigan Today, the University of Michigan’s publication, reported in 2016 what those pages and the years after them showed King.
According to that account, the state police had held hair evidence from Timothy King and Mark Stebbins for about 35 years before mitochondrial DNA testing in 2012. King said documents he was told had been destroyed later reached him through reporters. He said information withheld from him as too sensitive to release was later disclosed at a prosecutor’s press conference. In 2016 he began publishing his family’s account online at occk.info, with affidavits, police reports, and court filings attached.
Kristine Mihelich’s family took a different route. In April 2012, attorney Paul Hughes filed a $100 million federal lawsuit on behalf of her mother, Deborah Jarvis, against Oakland County’s prosecutor and sheriff and state police investigators. UPI reported that the suit accused them of withholding information and asked the court to send the files to the U.S. Department of Justice. WDIV reports it was dismissed in 2013.
Fourteen years later, at the fiftieth anniversary, Kristine’s sister Erica Ascroft described where things stood for her family:
“There’s been no communication from law enforcement in any capacity.”
Erica Ascroft, sister of Kristine Mihelich, to WXYZ, 2026She told WXYZ that silence dated to about 2016 or 2017. A state police spokesman said detectives would contact families if there were updates.
The pattern is consistent across both families. The people with the greatest stake in the record have had to obtain it through litigation, through reporters, or not at all. A victim’s father built the most complete public archive of the investigation, and the agency holding the file treated him as a records requester.
The Narrative Market
When institutions release little, other people fill the space. Detroit television stations have produced investigative series and a five-part documentary on the case. Marney Rich Keenan, a Detroit News reporter for 26 years, spent ten years on The Snow Killings: Inside the Oakland County Child Killer Investigation, published by McFarland in 2020. Her book argues that investigative leads, especially about Busch, were covered up, and that infighting between police and prosecutors damaged the case. She told WXYZ she believed Busch was involved but that his role as the killer was not established.
When WXYZ asked the state police task force about Keenan’s book, the response was four words:
“don’t comment on fiction”
Michigan State Police task force, responding to WXYZ about The Snow Killings, September 2020That response captures the ecosystem in miniature. A decade of reporting built partly on records the families pried loose was met with a label rather than a correction. If specific claims in the book are wrong, the records that would show it are the same records the public cannot see. An agency that will neither release its file nor rebut a reporter’s findings point by point leaves readers to choose between narratives, and the case becomes an audience contest.
Here is what I notice when I put the last fifty years side by side.
The suspect was cleared by a test the public cannot read.
The task force closed without a public accounting.
The hair waited decades for a lab.
The lead was dropped when the lead county changed.
The father had to sue.
The reporter was told her work was fiction.
The sister stopped getting calls.
Six things repeated about this case, checked against the record
Tap or click a card to see what the documented record supports.
Fact by Repetition
Every long-running case develops a canon. Some of the OCCK canon is documented. Some of it is the residue of press conferences, interviews with retired investigators, and the same claims restated across books, broadcasts, podcasts, and message boards until they feel settled. Busch was cleared. Busch was the killer. The DNA solved it. The DNA ruled it out. Each version has appeared in public at one point or another, and each depends on records the public has never seen in full.
Repetition is how an information vacuum gets filled. It is also how a case gets harder to solve. A tipster who has absorbed one canonical theory may not call with a detail that contradicts it. A new investigator inheriting a file may inherit the canon along with it. A family may spend years litigating to test a narrative that a single released document could have settled.
What became accepted about this case because evidence supports it, and what became accepted because it was repeated for decades by people who had partial access to the file? Until the institutions that hold the record answer that question with documents, the public conversation will keep answering it with stories.
How the institutions managed the record
Grades assess how the case file has been controlled, shared, and explained, not who committed the crimes. Select a row to see the basis for the grade.
Verdict: the evidence was kept. The explanations were not.
What Closure Would Require
Closure in this case may or may not mean an arrest. Most of the people publicly connected to it are dead or decades into prison sentences for other crimes. Theodore Lamborgine, charged in 2006 in the Cass Corridor child sex ring case, is serving a life sentence; investigators have said they believe he holds valuable information and is not the killer. Francis Sheldon, who owned most of North Fox Island and, according to investigators, counted Busch as a friend and customer, fled the country in 1976, was never prosecuted, and died in 1996. Closure here may have to be an accounting. That still requires the records.
Four changes would move this case, and every case like it, toward an accounting instead of another decade of competing narratives.
When a cold case spans jurisdictions, a single agency should be designated by written agreement as the custodian of the complete file, with every participating agency’s records consolidated and indexed. The 2026 posture, with the state police leading and the sheriff exploring new tools, should not depend on informal cooperation.
Since 2022, the federal Homicide Victims’ Families’ Rights Act has let families in federally investigated cold cases request a formal case file review, which must be completed within six months. The law does not reach state or local investigations. Michigan should extend the same right to families in cases worked by its own agencies. Whether the FBI’s documented role in the OCCK investigation qualifies these families under the federal law is a question their counsel could test now.
When a named suspect is excluded, the basis for the exclusion should be documented in a form that can eventually be released, even if the underlying polygraph or DNA report cannot. A clearance that cannot be explained is not a clearance the public can rely on.
Michigan’s FOIA lets agencies withhold records that would interfere with law enforcement proceedings. A case with no charges in half a century, whose most-discussed suspects are dead, should face a presumption that its non-forensic investigative history becomes public, with redactions for living witnesses and victims’ privacy.
The Records I Am Requesting
This series will be built on documents, and the requests start now. They target the decisions, not the evidence: the records that show who decided what, when, and on what basis.
Michigan State Police: records documenting the December 1978 shutdown of the original task force, including any closing memorandum and the transfer or retention of its files; written agreements or memoranda governing later task forces; evidence submission and laboratory request logs for hair evidence in the Stebbins and King cases from 1977 through 2012; and any written basis for closing the Busch line in 2010.
Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office and Sheriff’s Office: interagency agreements on the OCCK investigation since 2005, records of communications with victims’ families, and records describing the 2026 file digitization and DNA review.
Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office: records of its participation in the OCCK task force from 2005 to 2012 and of any request that its investigator withdraw.
Why This Could Happen Again
Maybe the most important thing OCCK can teach us is not only what happened between 1976 and 1977. It is what happened during the fifty years afterward.
This outcome did not require bad faith. The structure was enough. Shared jurisdiction with no designated custodian. A statute that keeps the tool used to clear a suspect out of public view. A public records law that treats a murdered child’s father the same as any other requester. No legal duty to keep families informed. No obligation to explain why a lead was dropped. Every one of those conditions exists in Michigan today, in cold cases that have not made the news.
That is why this series sits outside the suspect wars. I am not here to add a theory. I am here to find out what the institutions holding this case decided, and to put those decisions where the public and the families can finally see them. If that ends in closure, it will be because the record was opened, not because a story was told well enough.
The Michigan State Police says the case remains open and that every tip is investigated. Information goes to 1-855-MICHTIP (855-642-4847). Records, documents, or firsthand knowledge of how the investigation was managed can be sent to Clutch Justice at hello@clutchjustice.com. Background on the case and its overlap with the North Fox Island operation is in the OCCK and North Fox Island Reference Library.
Part II maps who had access to whom: the investigators, prosecutors, judges, journalists, and families who held pieces of this case, and the lines that connected them.
Rita Williams, Who Controlled the Information? The Oakland County Child Killer Case After 1977, Clutch Justice (Oct. 1, 2026), https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/01/oakland-county-child-killer-who-controlled-the-information/.
APA 7Williams, R. (2026, October 1). Who controlled the information? The Oakland County Child Killer case after 1977. Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/01/oakland-county-child-killer-who-controlled-the-information/
MLA 9Williams, Rita. “Who Controlled the Information? The Oakland County Child Killer Case After 1977.” Clutch Justice, 1 Oct. 2026, clutchjustice.com/2026/10/01/oakland-county-child-killer-who-controlled-the-information/.
ChicagoWilliams, Rita. “Who Controlled the Information? The Oakland County Child Killer Case After 1977.” Clutch Justice, October 1, 2026. https://clutchjustice.com/2026/10/01/oakland-county-child-killer-who-controlled-the-information/.
Continue Your Investigation
If this reporting raised more questions, use the Clutch Justice ecosystem to keep going.