The Docket — Issue 10

The Recusal Nobody Filed

Week of June 9, 2025 • Difficulty: Challenging

The Scenario

Four judges. Four counties where the complaint process moved quietly through official channels. Each judge faced a complaint that aligned with a documented JTC category — and each received a different disposition. The evidence is in the clues. Can you reconstruct the matrix before the next filing deadline? All judges and cases in this puzzle are fictional.

Clues

  1. Judge Amara is not from Clinton County or Montcalm County.
  2. The judge from Mecosta County received a dismissed with cautionary letter outcome.
  3. Judge Kowalski was investigated for conflicts of interest.
  4. The judge investigated for courtroom demeanor violations was recommended for suspension.
  5. Judge Okafor presided in Clinton County.
  6. Judge Amara received a removal recommendation.
  7. The judge from Van Buren County was investigated for failure to timely decide motions.
  8. Judge Reyes is not from Mecosta County.
  9. Judge Amara was investigated for courtroom demeanor violations.
  10. Judge Kowalski is from Montcalm County.

Your Grid

Judge County Complaint Outcome

The Docket publishes every Tuesday at 10:00 AM EST. Subscribe to Clutch Justice to get each new puzzle in your inbox. Miss last week? Play Issue 09.

From the editor

The patterns in these puzzles are fictional. The ones in Michigan’s courts aren’t. Rita maps those for a living.