Case Summary — Active Litigation

On June 27, 2025, Battle Creek resident Mark Foley filed a Complaint for Writ of Mandamus against the Michigan State Police LEIN Field Services Unit in the Michigan Court of Claims. The complaint alleges that MSP failed to investigate documented evidence of criminal misconduct involving the Law Enforcement Information Network — including alleged unauthorized database access, stalking and intimidation under color of law, a death threat the complaint states is substantiated in sworn records submitted to the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, and the involvement of an unverified individual identified in the complaint only as “Michael DeLoach.” Process was served June 30, 2025. All claims are allegations; the lawsuit has not been adjudicated.

Key Points
The Complaint Foley v. Michigan State Police LEIN Field Services Unit — Complaint for Writ of Mandamus, Michigan Court of Claims, filed June 27, 2025. Process served June 30, 2025. The complaint seeks to compel MSP to conduct an investigation it has allegedly refused to perform despite statutory duty under MCL 28.214 and the CJIS/LEIN enforcement framework.
What the Complaint Alleges Unauthorized access and misuse of the LEIN database by two authorized law enforcement users; stalking and intimidation carried out under color of law; a death threat the complaint states is substantiated in sworn records; and MSP’s deliberate refusal to investigate despite the submission of approximately 180 pages of supporting documentation including sworn affidavits and official dispatch records.
The “Officer DeLoach” Question The complaint references a figure identified only as “Michael DeLoach” — whose role, department, and existence as a law enforcement official have not been verified. The complaint alleges that no law enforcement agency has compelled identification of this individual or explained how confidential LEIN data was allegedly used to target Foley during what he states was a period when he was fleeing domestic abuse.
Timeline Foley states the initial abuse of LEIN was reported in 2020. The complaint alleges that neither MSP nor local law enforcement agencies have provided accountability or transparency in the five years since that initial report.
QuickFAQs
What is LEIN and why does unauthorized access matter?
The Law Enforcement Information Network is Michigan’s law enforcement database, providing authorized users with access to criminal histories, personal information, and sensitive records. Unauthorized access or personal use of authorized access — such as using LEIN to track or stalk a private citizen — is misconduct subject to mandatory auditing and discipline under Michigan law. Foley’s complaint alleges two authorized LEIN users accessed and misused the database to target him, and that MSP failed to investigate that alleged misuse despite statutory obligation.
What is a Writ of Mandamus?
A court order compelling a government official or body to perform a duty they are legally required to perform. Foley’s complaint seeks to compel MSP to investigate the alleged LEIN misuse — not to adjudicate the underlying claims but to require that an investigation be conducted that the complaint alleges MSP has refused to conduct.
What is the current case status?
Filed June 27, 2025. Process served June 30, 2025. Active in the Michigan Court of Claims. All allegations are unproven claims in active litigation. MSP has not issued a public statement about the complaint.

The Case: Foley v. Michigan State Police

Battle Creek resident Mark Foley filed a Complaint for Writ of Mandamus in the Michigan Court of Claims on June 27, 2025, naming the Michigan State Police LEIN Field Services Unit as defendant. The complaint alleges that MSP failed — and has continued to fail over a period of approximately five years — to investigate documented evidence of criminal misconduct involving the Law Enforcement Information Network, Michigan’s law enforcement database system, despite a statutory duty to do so under applicable Michigan and federal law.

Case Record Active Litigation
Case StyleMark Foley v. Michigan State Police LEIN Field Services Unit
CourtMichigan Court of Claims
Case TypeComplaint for Writ of Mandamus
FiledJune 27, 2025
Process ServedJune 30, 2025
Supporting DocumentationApproximately 180 pages — sworn affidavits, internal records, official dispatch records
Initial Report to MSP2020
MSP Public StatementNone on record

What the Complaint Alleges

Allegation 01
Unauthorized LEIN Access and Database Misuse

The complaint alleges that two authorized LEIN users accessed the Law Enforcement Information Network for unauthorized purposes — specifically, to target Foley. LEIN access is governed by MCL 28.214 and the CJIS/LEIN enforcement framework, which require auditing of database access and mandates investigation and discipline for misuse. The complaint alleges MSP failed to conduct that mandatory investigation despite being presented with evidence of the alleged misuse.

Allegation 02
Stalking and Intimidation Under Color of Law

The complaint alleges that stalking and intimidation of the plaintiff were carried out under color of law — meaning through the use of law enforcement status, access, or authority — rather than as the conduct of private individuals. Carrying out such conduct under color of law implicates federal civil rights statutes in addition to Michigan criminal law governing stalking and witness intimidation.

Allegation 03
A Death Threat — Substantiated in Sworn Records

The complaint states that a known death threat against Foley is substantiated in sworn records submitted to the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission. The involvement of the JTC — the body that oversees judicial misconduct complaints — in what began as a law enforcement misconduct matter raises questions about the scope of the relationships the complaint alleges were used to insulate the alleged misconduct from investigation.

Allegation 04
The “Officer DeLoach” Question

The complaint references a figure identified only as “Michael DeLoach” — an individual whose role, department, and law enforcement status have not been verified through publicly available records. The complaint alleges that no law enforcement agency has compelled the identification of this individual or explained his alleged role in the conduct targeting Foley. The complaint further alleges that confidential LEIN data was used to target Foley during a period when he states he was fleeing domestic abuse, and that no agency has provided an explanation for how that access occurred.

The Legal Grounds Cited

The complaint identifies four categories of legal violation: statutory violations under MCL 28.214, MCL 257.208c, and the CJIS/LEIN enforcement framework, which mandate auditing and discipline for database misuse; deliberate indifference by MSP in refusing to act on evidence of stalking, threats, and officer misconduct including an allegedly falsified consent in a police report; constitutional violations including denial of due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment, with the plaintiff allegedly denied meaningful legal access for more than a year; and obstruction of remedies through alleged internal interference by MSP staff, who Foley states redirected the investigation away from the original misconduct and failed to facilitate access to the Michigan Court of Claims.

“This isn’t just about unanswered questions. It’s about ignored responsibilities and abandoned safeguards. The evidence was real, the risk was real, and the silence from the state was deliberate.”
— Mark Foley, plaintiff, in a statement accompanying the complaint

Foley further stated that when law enforcement connections lead to special treatment and falsified reports, investigation is not merely appropriate — it is a clear duty. He characterized the situation as one in which documented crime requires documented accountability. MSP has not issued a public response to the complaint.

The Structural Issue: LEIN as a Tool of Harm

The LEIN database is one of the most sensitive information systems in Michigan law enforcement. It contains personal information — addresses, vehicle registrations, criminal history, family relationships — that can be used to locate, track, and target private individuals. Its access is limited to authorized personnel precisely because of that sensitivity. When authorized access is allegedly used to target a person rather than to serve law enforcement purposes, the harm is compounded by the power differential: the person being targeted typically has no way to know their information is being accessed, no way to prevent it, and limited recourse when the accessing institution declines to investigate its own personnel. The Foley complaint is, among other things, a case study in what happens when the mandatory accountability mechanisms for LEIN misuse — the auditing and investigation requirements under MCL 28.214 — allegedly fail to function.

Documentation related to the complaint is available upon request through the plaintiff’s publicly disclosed contact information, as noted in the original Clutch Justice publication. The filing, supporting affidavits, and exhibit documentation were made available to Clutch Justice in connection with this coverage. Clutch Justice will report on developments in the case as they occur.

Sources and Documentation

Court Filing Mark Foley v. Michigan State Police LEIN Field Services Unit — Complaint for Writ of Mandamus, Michigan Court of Claims (Filed June 27, 2025; Process Served June 30, 2025)
Law MCL 28.214 — Michigan LEIN Governance and Audit Requirements
Law MCL 257.208c — Related Michigan Statutory Framework
Framework CJIS/LEIN Enforcement Framework — Federal-State Database Compliance Requirements
How to Cite This Article
Bluebook (Legal)

Rita Williams, Battle Creek Man Sues Michigan State Police for Alleged LEIN Misuse, Clutch Justice (July 1, 2025), https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/01/battle-creek-man-sues-michigan-state-police-for-alleged-lein-misuse/.

APA 7

Williams, R. (2025, July 1). Battle Creek man sues Michigan State Police for alleged LEIN misuse. Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/01/battle-creek-man-sues-michigan-state-police-for-alleged-lein-misuse/

MLA 9

Williams, Rita. “Battle Creek Man Sues Michigan State Police for Alleged LEIN Misuse.” Clutch Justice, 1 July 2025, clutchjustice.com/2025/07/01/battle-creek-man-sues-michigan-state-police-for-alleged-lein-misuse/.

Chicago

Williams, Rita. “Battle Creek Man Sues Michigan State Police for Alleged LEIN Misuse.” Clutch Justice, July 1, 2025. https://clutchjustice.com/2025/07/01/battle-creek-man-sues-michigan-state-police-for-alleged-lein-misuse/.

Work With Rita Williams · Clutch Justice
“I map how institutions hide from accountability. That map is what I sell.”
01 Government Accountability & Institutional Forensics 02 Procedural Abuse Pattern Recognition 03 Legal AI & Court Systems Domain Expertise