The way America handles crime in general is pretty abysmal. Sweden’s approach to rehabilitation, by contrast, is much different. My hope is that these three essays shed much needed light on where America is failing its citizens.

Comparing the Female Crime Rate: United States vs. Sweden

I selected Sweden, which according to the U.S. Department of State, enjoys a lower crime rate than that of the United States (Sweden, 2020: Crime and safety report, 2020). Examining data from a 2006 International Study of women’s prisons, America houses a total of 209,980 female inmates at the combined local, state, and Federal levels (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008). The U.S. maintains a total of 108 female custody facilities (Young & Reviere, 2006). As of 2006 data, Sweden only maintains four female-only prison facilities, the largest able to accommodate 95 prisoners (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008).

209,980 Female inmates in U.S. custody (2006, all levels)
4 Female-only prison facilities in Sweden (2006)
5.35% U.S. homicide rate (UN UNODC, 2016)
1.08% Sweden homicide rate (UN UNODC, 2016)

In America, women comprise 9% of the prison population, while in Sweden, women make up 6.8% (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008). Drug offenses are the number one cause of incarceration for both countries (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008).

Treatment of Female Prisoners: Similarities and Differences

Treatment of female prisoners in the United States and Sweden are similar in that both are housed separately from male prisoners (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008). Health care is viewed as a basic necessity with a woman-centered approach in both countries (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008). Both countries allow babies to stay with their incarcerated mothers, but for significantly different lengths of time (International Centre for Prison Studies, 2008).

Category
United States
Sweden
Housing model
Dormitories with small cell accommodations
Normalized living conditions; apartment-style accommodations at some facilities
Mother-infant contact
Babies allowed to stay up to 3 months depending on facility
Mothers with infants up to one year old may care for children while incarcerated
Family visits
Limited; children of incarcerated mothers at high risk of foster care placement
As many visits as possible when staff and space allow; home leave regularly employed to maintain family ties
Physical environment
Barbed wire walls, heavy doors, segregation used as punishment
Designed to resemble normal life; Hinesburg facility includes apartment with garden for children’s overnight visits
Parental rights
Mothers cannot participate in reunification plans; termination of parental rights may occur
Family connection is a stated priority; home leave specifically designed to maintain parent-child bonds
I am truly impressed in the way Sweden connects offenders with their family. Considering that work-family conflict is higher in America, I am saddened, yet unsurprised that the United States fails to place the same emphasis on family.

Does Treatment Explain the Difference in Crime Rates?

I believe that Labeling Theory plays a heavy role in how female prisoners behave and are treated. The societal stigma against female parolees has been found to be greater than that facing males (Cowan, 2019). In step with Feminist theories, United States prisons are mainly designed for men, with vocational programs favoring traditional female careers such as secretaries or beauticians (Lilly et al, 2019).

The Scandinavian Difference — Politics vs. Evidence The living conditions in United States prisons consistently remind one that they are in a prison, where the Scandinavian prison model typically looks more like a home. Scandinavian prisons better prepare people for life on the outside by letting them practice life skills while serving time. Unlike America, criminal justice policy also rarely enters political debate in Sweden. Sweden trusts its prison professionals and adopts results-based policies, developed by accomplished criminologists and scholars (Larson, 2013).

I also believe the difference in living conditions and treatment contribute to the differences in crime rates. The living conditions in United States prisons consistently remind one that they are in a prison, where the Scandinavian prison model typically looks more like a home, even described as “cushy” (Larson, 2013).

Academic References

Cowan, B. A. (2019, April). Incarcerated women: Poverty, trauma and unmet need. American Psychological Association. apa.org

Finney-Hairston, C.F. (2003). Prisoners and their families: Parenting issues during incarceration. In J. Travis and M. Waul (Eds). Prisoners Once Removed. The Urban Institute Press.

International Centre for Prison Studies. International profile of women’s prisons. (2008, April). King’s College London, University of London.

Larson, D. (2013, August 30). Why Scandinavian prisons are superior. The Atlantic. theatlantic.com

Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2019). Criminological theory: context and consequences. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sweden 2020 Crime & Safety Report. (2020, April 2). osac.gov

United Nations. Intentional Homicide Victims. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. dataunodc.un.org

Williams, J. C., & Boushey, H. (2010, January 25). The Three Faces of Work-Family Conflict. americanprogress.org

World Prison Brief. (2018). Sweden. prisonstudies.org

Young, V., Reviere, R. (2006). Women behind bars: Gender and race in U.S. prisons. Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.

Pre-Order Now · Clutch Justice So You Want to Be a Citizen Detective Rita Williams’ guide to investigating the systems that affect your life — public records, court filings, and the paper trails institutions leave behind.
Pre-Order →
How to cite: Williams, R. [Rita]. (2024, December 30). Why Sweden Treats Incarcerated Women Better — and Why the U.S. Pays the Price. Clutch Justice. https://clutchjustice.com/2024/12/30/women-incarceration-us-sweden-comparison/