Why Real Public Safety Starts After Release
Vanessa Santiago’s story should have been one of redemption.
After her release, she did everything right. She found steady work, built a strong record, and proved herself reliable. But when she disclosed to her employer that she was on parole, she was fired. No misconduct. No warning. Just gone.
The Vera Institute of Justice shared her story to illustrate what happens when “second chances” are nothing more than slogans. For people like Vanessa, punishment doesn’t end at release; it follows them into job interviews, housing applications, and even doctors’ offices.
Now, new work requirements for Medicaid threaten to make things worse, conditioning access to healthcare on employment that many can’t obtain, precisely because of their record. It’s a cruel loop: you can’t work without health, and you can’t access healthcare without work.
“Punishment doesn’t end at release; it follows people home, into job interviews, doctors’ offices,
and every locked door labeled opportunity.”
The False Choice Between Accountability and Redemption
Critics love to frame “second chances” as softness on crime. It’s an easy soundbite, and it plays well in politics. But it’s a false choice, one that keeps our country locked into a system that produces the very outcomes it claims to prevent.
The reality is simple: accountability and redemption are not opposites. They are parts of the same process. Accountability demands responsibility for one’s actions; redemption demands the opportunity to prove change is possible. Without both, justice becomes vengeance.
But our system has chosen vengeance.
We build policy around fear rather than evidence. We treat people as permanent risks instead of potential contributors. The result? A justice system that is more interested in punishment than prevention.
We have more than two million people incarcerated, and roughly one in three American adults has some form of criminal record. That record becomes a lifelong barrier to work, housing, education, and even voting. For many, release doesn’t mean freedom; it means a new kind of confinement, one written in job rejections and eviction notices.
When we make survival nearly impossible for people leaving prison, we shouldn’t be shocked when they return. Recidivism is not proof that people can’t change; it’s proof that our system refuses to let them.
This “tough on crime” mindset doesn’t create safer neighborhoods. It just creates more broken ones. Families are destabilized, children grow up without parents, and entire communities are trapped in a cycle of instability that spans generations.
We can’t incarcerate our way to safety. We’ve been trying for decades. It hasn’t worked.
“Recidivism isn’t proof that people can’t change.
It’s proof that our system refuses to let them.”
The Evidence for Second Chances
Study after study confirms that access to stable employment, housing, and healthcare reduces reoffending far more effectively than extended sentences or harsher penalties. The data isn’t ambiguous; it’s overwhelming.
If public safety is the goal, second chances are the strategy.
A 2023 Bureau of Justice Statistics report found that formerly incarcerated people who gain steady employment within a year of release are up to50 percent less likely to return to prison. Another is from a RAND Corporation study in 2022 concluded that post-release education and job training programs lower recidivism by more than 40 percent on average.
These aren’t theories; they’re outcomes.
When people are given the chance to rebuild, they do. Communities benefit. Tax burdens drop. Families stabilize. Neighborhoods grow stronger. This is what real public safety looks like: safety built on inclusion, not exclusion.
Contrast that with the policies that still dominate our landscape: work requirements for healthcare, blanket bans on hiring, and rigid housing restrictions. These measures don’t protect society; they sabotage reintegration.
We have to stop pretending that every person with a record is the same. The vast majority of those incarcerated are not violent offenders. Many were caught in cycles of poverty, addiction, or untreated mental illness, conditions we criminalize instead of confronting.
When someone serves their sentence, they’ve paid their debt. But our system demands compound interest.
And so, we set them up to fail.
We label them “high risk.” We deny them jobs. We deny them homes. We deny them dignity. Then we shake our heads when they fall back into desperation. That isn’t justice, it’s sabotage by design.
“They’ve paid their debt.
But our system demands compound interest.”
Systemic Obstacles Still in Place
We like to say, “everyone deserves a second chance.” But our laws, our policies, and our practices say otherwise.

Take Medicaid work requirements.
On paper, they promote employment. In reality, they punish those who can’t find work, especially those with a criminal record. A policy designed to encourage responsibility ends up denying healthcare to the very people trying hardest to rebuild. Without treatment for mental health, substance use, or chronic conditions, relapse becomes almost inevitable.
Next, housing. Across the country, “no-felony” rental policies remain legal. Landlords can, and often do, reject applicants based solely on criminal history, regardless of how old the conviction is or what it involved. Public housing programs have similar restrictions, meaning thousands of people leave prison with nowhere to go. Many end up in shelters, cars, or on the street, conditions that are inherently unstable and unsafe.
Then there’s employment discrimination.
More than half of all U.S. employers still use background checks to automatically disqualify applicants with records. Licensing boards in dozens of states bar people from entire professions, from barbering to nursing to construction, based on past convictions, even when those convictions have no relevance to the work.
The hypocrisy is staggering. We tell people to “learn a trade” or “get certified,” but the system blocks them from using the skills we say they need.
And we rarely talk about the ripple effects on families. When a parent can’t get a job, the entire household suffers. Children face higher risks of poverty, trauma, and future incarceration. The system doesn’t just punish the individual; it punishes their entire family tree.
These barriers don’t make us safer. They make us sicker, poorer, and more divided. They ensure that the cycle of incarceration continues, not because people are incapable of change, but because society refuses to let them.
“We call it “justice,” but what it really is…
is self-sabotage dressed as policy.”
A New Public Safety Model
It’s time to stop measuring justice by how many people we punish and start measuring it by how many people we help rebuild.
Real public safety starts after release.
A “smart justice” model focuses on prevention, rehabilitation, and reintegration, not perpetual punishment. It recognizes that community investment is a stronger crime deterrent than incarceration ever will be.
Here’s what that looks like in practice:
- Ban the Box laws that delay background checks until later in the hiring process, giving applicants a fair shot.
- Fair Chance Housing ordinances that prevent landlords from blanket discrimination based on criminal records.
- Occupational licensing reform to open skilled trades and professions to qualified returning citizens.
- Reentry support programs that provide job training, mentorship, and transitional housing.
These reforms aren’t radical, they’re practical. They’ve been tested in cities and states across the country and proven to work. In New York, the Center for Employment Opportunities found that participants in its reentry employment program were 22 percent less likely to be re-arrested and 33 percent more likely to be employed long-term.
In Michigan, the “Clean Slate” expungement law has helped thousands clear old records, leading to higher wages and lower recidivism.
And in Colorado, prison education programs have reduced repeat incarceration rates by nearly half.
This isn’t leniency. It’s logic.
A nation that claims to value hard work, redemption, and freedom should not build systems that deny all three to those trying to make good on them.
“Second chances aren’t mercy.
They’re strategy; the foundation of real public safety.”
Conclusion
Second chances are not a favor to the guilty; they are a safeguard for the innocent. They’re how we keep people from returning to crime and how we restore what mass incarceration has broken: families, neighborhoods, economies, and hope.
Every person who gets a real second chance becomes proof that redemption works. Every person denied one becomes evidence that the system still doesn’t.
The promise of justice isn’t about endless punishment; it’s about possibility.
It’s about building a society strong enough to forgive and smart enough to rebuild.
Public safety isn’t built in prisons… It’s built in the places people return to.