Posted: June 26, 2025
Luther W. Glenn, Jr. (P38683), a practicing attorney based in Detroit, Michigan, has been suspended from the practice of law for 30 days, effective immediately, following multiple violations of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct and court rules governing attorney discipline.
The suspension was issued by Tri-County Hearing Panel #15 after a formal hearing held pursuant to MCR 9.115. The ruling stems from Glenn’s failure to respond to three separate Requests for Investigation issued by the Attorney Grievance Administrator.
Failure to Respond to Disciplinary Authority
Although Glenn did appear for a sworn statement under subpoena and gave testimony related to the disciplinary inquiries, he failed to submit written responses to the original Requests for Investigation as well as to follow-up demands for additional information. This lack of cooperation formed the basis for several counts of professional misconduct.
Rule Violations Cited by the Hearing Panel
The panel found Glenn’s actions violated numerous rules, including:
- MRPC 8.1(a)(2) – Failing to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority (Counts 1–4).
- MCR 9.104(1) and MRPC 8.4(c) – Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice (Counts 1–4).
- MCR 9.104(2) – Conduct that exposes the legal profession or courts to contempt or censure (Counts 1–4).
- MCR 9.104(3) – Conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals (Counts 1–4).
- MCR 9.104(7) and MCR 9.113(B)(2) – Failing to answer a Request for Investigation (Counts 1 and 2).
Disciplinary Outcome and Costs
As a result of these findings, the hearing panel ordered a 30-day suspension of Glenn’s license to practice law in Michigan. Additionally, costs in the amount of $3,702.25 were assessed against him in connection with the disciplinary proceedings.
What This Means
This case underscores the critical importance of full cooperation with the Attorney Grievance Commission in Michigan. Even when no underlying client complaint is ultimately substantiated, a failure to respond to investigatory requests can result in disciplinary action, as was the case here.
Attorneys are not only expected to uphold the law—they are also obligated to assist in the regulation and integrity of their own profession.
Stay with us for continued updates on legal ethics and attorney discipline throughout the state.
