Published: July 16, 2025 | Harrison, MI
On July 16, 2025, the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board issued a formal Notice of Reprimand by Consent to Walter A. White, Jr. (P27792), a Harrison-based attorney, for professional misconduct during his representation of a client in a criminal jury trial. The reprimand became effective July 3, 2025.
The disciplinary action was the result of a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline filed jointly by White and the Grievance Administrator under MCR 9.115(F)(5). The agreement was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by Genesee County Hearing Panel #3.
As part of the stipulation, certain portions of the formal complaint—specifically subparagraphs 24(d) and 24(f)—were dismissed. However, White admitted to the remaining factual and misconduct allegations. The case centered on White’s failure to object to inadmissible impeachment evidence introduced during trial—a mistake that the panel determined prejudiced his client.
Based on White’s admissions and the stipulation, the panel concluded that he violated several key ethical and professional conduct rules:
- MRPC 1.1 – Failing to provide competent representation.
- MRPC 1.2(a) – Failing to seek the lawful objectives of his client.
- MRPC 1.3 – Failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness.
- MCR 9.104(2) – Engaging in conduct that brings contempt, censure, or reproach upon the legal profession or the courts.
The panel issued a public reprimand—a formal mark on White’s professional record—and assessed costs totaling $750.00.
This case serves as a cautionary example of the importance of vigilance and procedural awareness in the courtroom. Even a single missed objection can have far-reaching consequences for both client and counsel, and may ultimately invite disciplinary review.
